Chris Dillard's self-assessment places him at a Leadership Effectiveness Index of 66.43, landing in Band 4 — Solid Effectiveness — which reflects a leader who sees genuine capability in himself and is operating with meaningful awareness of his own strengths. However, because no rater submissions have been collected or processed at this time, the 360-degree side of this report is incomplete, and the gap analysis that forms the core of the LEAD process cannot yet be generated. What we have here is a strong starting point — a self-portrait — but not yet the full picture that makes this assessment most valuable. Once rater data is in hand, we will be able to compare how Chris experiences his own leadership against how those around him experience it.
Chris's self-reported scores place him in Q1 — Grounded Footing on the Footing Matrix, meaning he currently sees his leadership as anchored by both strong intent and solid mechanics. This is an encouraging self-perception, suggesting he enters the development conversation from a place of relative confidence rather than uncertainty. That said, the Footing Matrix gains its real power when rater data is layered in — the quadrant placement can shift meaningfully once we learn whether the people around Chris share that same read.
The immediate priority for Chris's development process is straightforward: close the data gap by ensuring rater submissions are collected and finalized so the full 360 analysis can proceed. His Change Readiness score of 1458 — Approaching Ready — signals that he is in a constructive posture for this work, neither resistant nor overwhelmed, which bodes well for productive coaching conversations ahead. Once rater data is available, this report will be reissued with complete gap analysis, and the real development work — exploring blind spots, validating strengths, and setting priorities — can begin in earnest.
The LEAD 360 framework is grounded in two interlocking cycles: the LIFE-cycle (Leadership Enrichment) and the TERM-cycle (Leadership Impairment). Your LEL-c and LIT-c scores indicate where you are currently operating in each cycle. Use this as a developmental compass — not a verdict.
These are your six impairment dimension scores from today's assessment. Higher scores indicate more active risk to your leadership footing. Use this as your baseline — the dimensions ranked highest are where drift begins. Revisit these scores at each assessment cycle to track your trajectory.
| Code | Dimension | Self Score | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Dashboard Fixation | 5.00 | MODERATE |
| B2 | Embracing a Lie | 4.33 | MODERATE |
| B1 | Temptation to Exclude | 2.75 | LOW |
| B3 | Relational Suffering | 2.25 | LOW |
| C3 | Status Protection | 2.00 | LOW |
| B4 | Moment of Truth | 1.67 | LOW |
Gap data unavailable — rater responses required for this section.
Gap data unavailable — rater responses required for this section.
| Code | Dimension | Self | 360 Composite | Gap |
|---|
All item scores from 1–10. Self = your self-assessment score for each item. Others = average across all submitted rater responses (shown when rater data is available). Items are grouped by dimension; D1 (Change Readiness) is self-only and has no rater equivalent.